Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fejokoo (crater)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of geological features on Ceres. (non-admin closure) sst ✈ 10:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fejokoo (crater)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Because we don't need an article about every crater in the known universe. Geogene (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per the spirit of WP:DWMP, whereby it is understood that we don't need an article about every tiny rock circling the Sun, we also don't need an article about every crater on every small planet. What is notable about Fejokoo? No sources are cited. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 06:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:40, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to ~~List of craters on Ceres or List of features on Ceres~~ List of geological features on Ceres, along with the rest listed in the template? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a List of geological features on Ceres article. Praemonitus (talk) 18:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Urwaru, Fejokoo, and Occator in particular are more notable than the rest - Urwaru has distinctive ridges, Fejokoo is near the mountain, and Occator has the most visible bright spots. "We don't need an article about every crater". Well, uh...then we'll have to delete most of the Mars and Mercury craters, otherwise we get a double standard. Treat it like a geological feature on Earth. DN-boards1 (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fejokoo isn't near the mountain, it's in a different hemisphere. That the page contained an image that misidentified this crater reinforces my point. Geogene (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of geological features on Ceres - News returns 3 hits, all mere mentions, even though other craters (in 2 of the articles), are gone into in slightly more depth. Scholar also had a single mention. Books had nothing, and neither did JSTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Fejokoo is used as the name for a quadrangle in mapping the world Ceres. Jonathunder (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which would fall under "no inherited notability", if only the quadrangle were itself notable. Geogene (talk) 19:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.