Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feeding India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feeding India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One year old student-founded charity that comprehensively fails the criteria at WP:ORG. This has been the subject of multiple speedy deletions for copyvio, blatant advertising, etc. in both draft and article space [1], [2]. It has been created yet again with no change except shortening and close-paraphrasing the copyvio. (I have removed the "Missions" and "Principles" sections). Note that the references are to general articles about hunger and food waste in India, not this organization. The only mentions appear to be in student newspapers and a self-written blurb on social.yourstory.com. I can find nothing better. It needs an AfD result to prevent further attempts at recreation. Given the utter failure of the article's creator to understand or engage with the issues and their determination to continue recreating this article, I also recommend salting this. Voceditenore (talk) 06:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note re the copyvio. The text pasted into this article and its previous versions is double copyvio. When checking for copyright infringement in the previous versions, I discovered that virtually all the text on their website (feedingindia.net) is actually copied verbatim from other websites for food banks in the US (affiliated to Feeding America) and the website of the Delhi NCR FoodBank. This includes their "Mission" and "Principles" and their exposition on food wastage in India. Just one example of many, compare Feeding India and Blue Ridge Area Food Bank. Voceditenore (talk) 06:02, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Voceditenore (talk) 07:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Voceditenore (talk) 07:00, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt (both titles, ie. "I" and "i") per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per nominator.4meter4 (talk) 08:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt per nom. I speedied the draft, so I'll leave it to another admin to close here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt both titles - Obviously here to promote so delete & salt –Davey2010^Talk 16:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt as per nom and all above. I looked at the previously deleted versions, there seems to be nothing notable here, unless there are sources unlisted and that my web search did not find. Time to think about a WP:SNOW close? DES ^(talk) 01:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not so sure about the salt as it's only been restarted twice now so unless there's intent to start again (there have been more blatant articles), I'll go soft on a salt for now. As for good notability, I found nothing good aside from the current Indian news links currently in the article. SwisterTwister talk 04:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.