Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feedback felching
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 03:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Feedback felching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibly a neologism, but I doubt even that, as there are no Google hits. Fails general notability guidelines. Chzz ► 03:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I prodded this, prod hasn't even been declined yet. At any rate, this is probably a notable practice, but not a notable neologism. Two Google web hits, neither are relevant; zero news hits. And felching means something else entirely. Hairhorn (talk) 03:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 14:15, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: cannot find any sources which back up the claim. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.