Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federico Vellani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Federico Vellani

Non-notable board game designer, who "appears to have withdrawn" and for whom there's no other evidence of notability. See this AfD for a related discussion. Would have bundled but was not aware of this article at the time. Bundling now:

Helmut Ohley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - same series of semi n-n games, no evidence of other notability
Lonny Orgler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Gary Mroczka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Note I am explicitly not listing those who seem to have other notability. TravellingCari 03:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin, should this end in delete, please note the number of re-directs in the above named article histories. May be a number to take care of. TravellingCari 04:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, treelo _radda 00:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per prior AfD, and nom. None of these meet the notability requirements. Themfromspace (talk) 06:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom --Az Cold As Ize (talk) 07:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note account above has been blocked as vandalism only. TravellingCari 12:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, and seriously consider deleting the list of 18XX games too. TallNapoleon (talk) 03:07, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom, why is this being re-listed over and over? There is a clear consensus on this, from what I can see. JBsupreme (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.