Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federation of the Green Parties of the Americas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Global Greens. (non-admin closure) ——SerialNumber54129 09:55, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Federation of the Green Parties of the Americas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails ORG. Just because it is part of a notable organization and contains notable entities does not mean that it is notable. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:35, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per below. Was: ~~Keep~~, although perhaps a careful "Merge" could be accomplished. At first glance this looks like it could be merged into List of green parties It has substantial content that could help in organizing the list-article's coverage. But there are other organizations of green parties that have separate articles (or list-articles) too (including Global Greens, the European Green Party, the Nordic Green Left Alliance) and maybe it is not so easy to merge them all in. It could be too cumbersome, in which case this is a reasonable split-out from the list-article or from the Green party article. It is NOT bad info which must be expunged. It could be developed with more information like the other ones have. Just because a list-article is shortish does not mean we need to have an AFD about it. Tag for development, perhaps, or post to the Talk pages of the related articles calling for some editors actually interested in the topic to consider a merger. --Doncram (talk) 00:45, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Global Greens; part of that organization and no independent coverage of this federation. I see no content to merge; the list of members is already on the suggested target. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:58, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, can someone please provide specific referencing that this entity is in fact "part of" the Global Greens organization? This reduces to a discussion of whether "Keep" or "merge/redirect" is appropriate, as opposed to any idea of "delete" as an outcome. --Doncram (talk) 06:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Is [1] sufficient referencing? power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Okay sure, changing !vote to "Redirect" above. The name per that source, Federación de Partidos Verdes de las Americas should also redirect. --Doncram (talk) 19:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.