Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feararchy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feararchy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this term has come into common usage even in academic circles; see WP:NEO. PROD was contested by author. Significant COI issues here, as well. VQuakr (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Neologism. Google search indicates it has failed to gain acceptance. Not notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 19:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. Can't find popular use of this term anywhere using Google. Ratibgreat (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not a notable neologism, and one person's pet theory. It is estimated that over 70 to 80% of all American organizations, corporations, federal and state governments, universities, and others are feararchies, subduing employees and contributing to the downfall of the organizations and society. I probably ought to get working on using fear to bring about the downfall of society, though. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little disappointed that with a handle like that, you're not pro-Feararchy, right or wrong. :) --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:39, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.