Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fear & Respect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Edge of Reality. General consensus appears to be that the article shouldn't exist, but that a redirect is acceptable. —SpacemanSpiff 09:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fear & Respect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A video game cancelled 4 years ago and apparently it wasn't in advanced stages. Fails WP:N. DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 16:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Although it never saw the light of day, it was significant enough to garner quite a bit of coverage. It's cancellation was noted by teh gaming press [1]. Maintream press covered it like this Washington Post article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) Reach Out to the Truth 17:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Edge of Reality or Midway Games and mention there. Whpq's links are fine for verification, but I don't think they are significant enough to meet notability. Marasmusine (talk) 14:24, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Marasmusine. Sources verify it, but don't establish notability. -Teancum (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (though no objection to a redirect). It's true that some cancelled games can be notable in that they become culturally significant (a la Duke Nukem Forever) but nothing in the article suggests this is one of them. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect. Not notable enough to warrant its own article. --Odie5533 (talk) 01:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete could not WP:verifynotability due to a lack of sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.