Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fayetteville Area System of Transit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep --Ichiro 23:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fayetteville Area System Transit

~~Wikipedia is not a bus schedule plus the POV~~ Jcbarr 14:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the rewrite to Fayetteville, North Carolina with great thanks to SPUI -Jcbarr 14:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC) (login isn't working at the moment, but this is me)[reply]

This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Currently a wish-list of the bus routes the author wants. Could be an article with lots of work (fix POV, add lots of detail), but at the moment, delete. Keep Following rework by SPUI. Well done!Kcordina 16:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I'm of the opinion that that would never make an article. Dan 18:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ remove the speculation and all you have is a list of bus routes, which is a WP:ISNOT (a directory).

Merge SPUI's rewrite to Fayetteville, North Carolina, with a redirect. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:15, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OR and some more. feydey 22:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; possibly majorly prune. The first sentence on its own is a decent stub. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have rewritten the article into a decent stub about a local bus system for a decent-sized city. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Couldn't what you wrote be merged into the Fayetteville page? It looks to me like this FAST page is an orphan. -Jcbarr 04:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as rewritten. As notable as a random high school, at least. Youngamerican 04:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand the new stub - I've seen other well-done transit authority articles, this one has potential if done right. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and thank SPUI for taking away all the original research. The public transit system in a city is an encyclopedic topic. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the article on the city itself, there is room for it there. Scoo 10:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a city guide. This is not encyclopedic information, is useful for very few people and will keep changing all the time. JoaoRicardo^talk 20:50, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep. this could be of use to a city planner of someone like that. Kingturtle 05:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to city article. Eusebeus 18:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.