Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatmess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fatmess[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability questionable. Unreferenced BLP. Viridae ^{DON'T PANIC} 09:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't find any related sources on this, save a few brief mentions on WoW forums. There's nothing on the Virgin Media claim either. I'd say it fails WP:GNG, WP:HOAX at worst. Funny ^Pika 10:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find anything in reliable sources. Looks like somebody bragging. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ss the person who originally PROD'd the article. I was also unable to find any credible reference to the claims made, particularly the Virgin claim, and the article only exists because of those (extraordinary) claims. InShaneee (talk) 11:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Altered copy of the Warv0x article.--Auric talk 15:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only seems to possess limited internet notability. Ducknish (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 13:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.