Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fat Free Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 17:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fat Free Art[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This gallery (no longer in operation) does not meet our notability criteria per WP:GNG nor WP:NCORP. The sourcing consists of a press release in StreetArtNews, and a database listing of posters for sale on an art sales website. An online WP:BEFORE search reveals social media posts, calendar listings, blogs, and a review about an artist who showed there but not about the gallery itself. Nothing substantial that could be considered significant coverage WP:SIGCOV seems to exist. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Visual arts, Companies, and New York. Netherzone (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Nothing found at all in reliable sources. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete this is the best I can find, and it's not enough without more since the focus is on the Sotheby's partnership/show and not in depth about the gallery. Star Mississippi 13:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not finding any new sources and the existing sources are not sufficient to show notability. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sourcing I can locate meets the criteria for establishing notability, fails NCORP/GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.