Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastvideo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fastvideo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find no independent sources (verbatim search fastvideo) covering this, nothing meeting WP:GNG or WP:CORP. I checked Google Scholar and can't find anything substantial there either; most of it seems to be referring to a Fastvideo camera rather than software, which this company creates. Largoplazo (talk) 17:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:32, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent WP:RS references. Refs provided are not reliable sources, as they are company-related sources; conference presentations by developers of the underlying technology aren’t independent. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 11:03, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotions and promotions alone. Light2021 (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DEL7. There aren't enough reliable sources to verify the information and I am not convinced about the notability of the company. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.