Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastest trains in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fastest trains in China[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do we need to make a list of every train with a number initialed "G", "C", or "D", considering the table will have been doubled by the end of this year? DS - fax 01:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I think it's not encyclopedic, but i just can't find a proper one in WP:NOT to fit this. --DS - fax 01:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Comment There is also Fastest trains in India, should be discussed altogether I think. Python eggs (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both this article and Fastest trains in India. "Fastest" is somewhat subjective, and the objective part of it is quite open to change. Also my experience in Chinese and Indian aircraft article editing says that these two articles are going to become "mine's bigger" edit-war targets sooner rather than later... - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. The lines themselves are worth an article, the trains themselves and their average speeds are not. Perhaps the fastest speed could be appended to a list of the train lines. MLA (talk) 21:45, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.