Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farrah Moan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)XboxGamer22408talk 02:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Farrah Moan[edit]

Farrah Moan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. There is a fair amount of limited coverage for participating in the reality show, but given the scarcity of sourcing for anything else, this fails WP:BLP1E. John from Idegon (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Two shows barely counts as notable. WP:ENTERTAINER states "significant roles". I don't think these two roles he's had are significant. Oath2order (talk) 20:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Drm310. Oath2order (talk) 20:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note - as nominator, redirect per Drm310 would be a satisfactory outcome; an outcome that would also allow the article's creator to polish the current article in his userspace until and if notability is shown. John from Idegon (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no notability of the performer baring the show in which she starred. Therefore delete. —IB [ Poke ] 10:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per GNG. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This is a simple GNG pass from sources already showing in the article. Don't overthink this: there are multiple, independent, published sources dealing substantially with the subject. Green light to write an article if that is fulfilled, no need to debate whether makeup artists are worthy of inclusion or whether special guidelines to allow an alternative path to prove notability for actors are met. Carrite (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep I echo the points made by @Carrite: Angusaditus (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.