Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farnell Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Premier Farnell. (non-admin closure) — Yash! ^(Y) 01:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Farnell Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former brand name of Premier Farnell. No references and orphaned; does not need its own page. Liam987 talk 00:43, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Plausible search term, there is a consistent but low level daily traffic. Redirecting is a no-brainer. 137.43.188.139 (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect appears to be the way to go. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (duh, why was this even relisted? I do not think the nominator would have objected...) Tigraan (talk) 15:20, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.