Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farleon (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Farleon[edit]

Farleon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After several source searches, the subject does not meet the requirements of WP:BASIC to qualify for an article. The first AfD discussion was closed as no consensus after receiving no participation. North America1000 21:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per nom, current citations are promotional, press releases, or mere mentions; or from non-RS sources. They show the person exists, but do not go to the notability. And I agree that they do not rise to level of fulfilling WP:BASIC. News, Highbeam, JStor and Newspaper searches return zero results. Books returns zero results to do with this particular person. Onel5969 TT me 15:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete promo advert of a non-notable musician/music producer, refs in the article are Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and listings in sales/download outlets like Soundcloud and Beatport. Nothing in-depth. Web searches turn up exactly this type of stuff. Kraxler (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.