Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farhana Rain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 02:09, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Farhana Rain[edit]

Farhana Rain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of significance and unreliable sources. Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 08:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No compelling evidence of notability. Google searches show zero reliable sources. Maybe there is Bangladeshi coverage but all it would demonstrate is that she is notable in her own country, and I would be surprised if it is sufficent for a WP article. Certainly not a "supermodel" which implies international fame and renown. Mabalu (talk) 11:58, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. –Davey2010(talk) 04:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the only source that allegedly claims that she is a "super" model is blocked. Fails WP:V. Bearian (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.