Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farahnaz Forotan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Farahnaz Forotan[edit]

Farahnaz Forotan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to fail WP:GNG The Banner talk 08:05, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:53, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete sourcing does not exist, see this news google search [1] nothing there. The sources on the page may well be primary, or government related. She is young, attractive, with a highly sympathetic backstory that is being pushed by someone, but that cannot be validated with RS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.