Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantasy online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy online[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly not an encyclopedia article. A PROD was previously contested. lifebaka++ 18:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The page appears to be primarily intended as a collection of links to various websites that contain fantasy-related material; it also appears to violate WP:OR. Obviously, the page would have to be fundamentally and completely rewritten in order for it to become encyclopedic. --SoCalSuperEagle (talk) 19:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- JN 466 21:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The topic may be notable, but as it is written the article falls foul of WP:NOT. It cites no sources, is written in the first person, and promises to develop into a directory of internet sites (which Wikipedia is not for). --JN 466 21:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I suppose fantasy on the internet might be an interesting, (notable,) and encyclopedic topic, but this page is just a mess. EL spam, OR, improper tone, etc. OSborn^arf_contribs. 21:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essay, and article subject is far too non-specific. —Lowellian (reply) 03:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.