Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Four vs. the X-Men

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic Four vs. the X-Men[edit]

Fantastic Four vs. the X-Men (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since creation, almost entirely WP:PLOT. No evidence in searches of passing WP:GNG - all search results are to fan-created content, pricing guides, eBay, etc. No evidence that this had any broader impact outside of the series named. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the Google News link, above, shows ongoing RS coverage sufficient to meet GNG. Jclemens (talk) 07:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With the exception of a The Hollywood Reporter article speculating about a possible movie deal "reportedly in the works", those GNews results are blogs and other fan-generated content. None appear to be true RS. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 11:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indie Wire, Uproxx, Comic Book Resources, IGN, Collider (website), and Screen Rant are all non-RS? I find your above statement problematic. I know Google News content can vary slightly from place to place, but I'm seeing things that are entirely inconsistent with your statement. Jclemens (talk) 01:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree with Jclemens that reliable sources mention the series, but I haven't been able to find coverage beyond trivial mentions in articles speculating about a potential film featuring both teams. It's unlikely than any eventual film will have much in common with this miniseries aside from - maybe - a name. Argento Surfer (talk) 15:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced, purely in-universe comic book precis. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails in the sourcing department, but might be a merge candidate for a limited comic book series list. Atsme📞📧 21:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: same article creator for Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Before_the_Fantastic_Four:_The_Storms Atsme📞📧 22:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.