Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Guy: Shown in the Cinema, on November 23rd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I predict that this article will be deleted for being a crystal ball'er seicer | talk | contribs 14:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy: Shown in the Cinema, on November 23rd

Too soon for an article, only Google hits I could find say the movie is in talks, no plot, no release date (like in the title) Caldorwards4 (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is not even enough information for any sort of article. The article is completely unreferenced, and very few google hits with any sort of information or from reliable third party sources. --Banime (talk) 00:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. MuZemike (talk) 01:22, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The odd title is based on the assertion, since removed, that the film would be released "on November 23, 2010". It could begin production within the next year. Let's wait to see what President Palin has to say about it. Mandsford (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Let's wait to see what President Palin has to say about it." Please, this is a family-friendly encyclopedia. We don't want to scare people. :) JEdgarFreeman (talk) 01:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this unverified crystal ballery. It's already mentioned, though not sourced, at Family Guy#Feature length productions anyway. Cliff smith ^talk 01:59, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax article similar to a previously deleted Drawn Together article created by the creator of several previously deleted articles. Many sources are complete speculation, stemming merely from a comment made by Seth MacFarlane on The Tonight Show (and even that seems to say that he only said that he was "in talks with Fox Film" and that a film could be produced next year). It's mostly crystal ballery mixed in with hoax and pure speculation Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 03:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of reliable sources, crystallery, etc. miranda 06:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Apparently Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters has inspired some editor here to create a series of other articles about theatrical films with long and implausible titles based on animated television series. However, we are only interested in such articles if the theatrical films actually exist. Please warn the article creator accordingly. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DELET'D! -i know it's CoolNSexyRickz all the time. He's not welcomed in this Wiki. TVB 11:11, September 21, 2008 (UTC)
Requested speedy deletion. There is almost no real content in the article --Church of emacs (Talk | Stalk) 13:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can't request an article for speedy deletion while it is undergoing an AFD. AfD is used to determine consensus to see if an article should be kept or deleted. miranda 15:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have never heard of there being anything wrong with tagging an article for speedy deletion when it's up for AfD, presuming the speedy tag is appropriate. Have you got a link to this, by any chance? Just curious. (Although, for the record, I don't think the tag *was* appropriate in this case. Also for the record, staying neutral in this debate.) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 17:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Schuym1 (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as classic WP:CRYSTAL situation. Also, the title given to this article is not only puzzling, it makes the whole thing look like a hoax. 23skidoo (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notable information is confirmed. Martarius (talk) 06:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources given don't include that title. I said it before, and I'll say it again, this reads more like something read straight from a movie poster rather than an actual movie title. Most movie posters have release dates. Sure, McFarlane gets often too unrealistic with his gags, but common, would he make such a ridiculous title? I don't think so. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.