Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Broadcasting Television

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tiptoety ^talk 01:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Family Broadcasting Television

Hoax article, claiming to be a joint venture between Global Media Arts and ABS-CBN; I did a Google and Yahoo search on the station and it seems obvious that it is, adding to the fact that the two major stations are unlikely to sign a contract between each other. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 10:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Google only brings up links to Wikipedia. So yeah, it's a likely hoax. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 12:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~G3 Hoax. So tagged.~~ Strong delete Hoax. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 12:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likely a hoax, I also did a quick Google search that yielded no results except the actual article. RedThunder 12:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agreed. Also, the rivalry between ABS-CBN and GMA 7 makes it unlikely, if not impossible, to collaborate on a joint venture. And no press release or valid statements, if any, were made regarding this. It is a hoax. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax per the nom's google search. My cable and local tv channel surfing also concludes that this does not exist.--Lenticel ^(talk) 23:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definite hoax (that coming from a Filipino TV junkie). Starczamora (talk) 01:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete to end its misery. --Howard the Duck 03:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. We don't need hoaxes here, you know. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.