Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: Equestria (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily userfy per author's request. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fallout: Equestria

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources utilized in the article are actually reliable sources. Most are editorials or derisive passing mentions of this work of fiction. Also of note is that the article was deleted last year for these exact same issues.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (lecture) @ 08:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy I wholeheartedly disagree with the nominator, but I believe that this is a notable work and I would like to have it moved back into my userspace for me to work on it more so that it may eventually meet notability standards. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 11:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.