Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falling Creek Camp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 05:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Falling Creek Camp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This camp was the subject of a feature in Time magazine in 2007. [1][2]. The camp has also been noted for its environmental efforts including a program to preserve and reintroduce rare pitcher plants. [3][4][5][6] On a more unpleasant note: [7][8] (and many other news reports about this case). --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The Time article is behind a paywall, but appears (according to your second link) to be "an article about boys growing up in today's society", not about the camp. The pitcher plant and child molestation stories fail WP:NOTINHEROTED. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nominator appears to be going through a list or category of summer camps and nominating them all for deletion, indiscriminately. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surprise Lake Camp for example, where a summer camp that really obviously meets wp:GNG is also nominated for deletion. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Kawanhee for Boys, where I also voted Keep. I assume wp:BEFORE standard is not met here, either, for this Falling Creek Camp. I voted Keep also for similar reason at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Ondessonk, too. --doncram 20:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC) --doncram 21:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I trust that whoever closes this AfD will take into account your partisan canvassing. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Exactly as i posted in response to Pigsonthewing's identical accusation at another of these AFDs: Absolute nonsense. Please do try to explain where there was any "canvassing" at all. In several AFDs on summer camps that Pigsonthewings has nominated, i have pointed to other ongoing AFDs about summer camps, pointing out some relatedness between the AFDs. This seems appropriate, there is no canvassing to user pages or to any Wikiprojects. Nonsense. --do ncr am 00:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep some coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.