Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fall of Envy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fall of Envy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this meets WP:NBAND. Note lack of third party sources establishing notability. Sro23 (talk) 01:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are potential notability claims being made here, but there are no reliable sources being provided to support them. This has also been tagged for several months as a likely conflict of interest with advertorial overtones, but there's been an edit war over the past couple of weeks, with an anonymous IP removing the tags on the basis of "improvements" which didn't consist of actually changing any of the advertorialism or adding any sources, but merely unwikifying the entire article (including the categories) so that it was a linkless and uncategorized dead end — and they revert-warred over it enough times that I've had to sprot the article against unregistered editors. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can rewrite it neutrally and reference it properly, but nothing claimed in the article entitles them to an automatic inclusion freebie in the absence of valid sources for it. Bearcat (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.