Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fall Foliage Tour
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fall Foliage Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This tour does not seem to demonstrate any inherent notability to warrant a separate article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanbarrybush (talk • contribs) 22 January 2011
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Alanbarrybush (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's up in the air for me. Performing at Carnegie Hall is pretty prestigious. I did a brief G News search, couldn't find much, but if more sources are found, I'll switch to keep. CTJF83 03:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed the Carnegie Hall show is in very high regard. It's just that I saw a listing on eBay for some promo photos and a program for the Carnegie Hall show. It came with an "itinerary" and the seller mentioned that it was part of the "Fall Foliage Tour," starting with the Caravan of Dreams rehearsals and ending at the Santa Fe Downs. Because the source is on eBay, I wouldn't call that a reliable source. --User:Alanbarrybush talk 17:13, 02 February 2011
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.