Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fairfield Transportation Center
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No one besides the nominator argued for deletion and they didn't address the sources added later. SoWhy 06:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Fairfield Transportation Center[edit]
- Fairfield Transportation Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A bus stop with some overhead cover isn't an encyclopedic subject. How is this notable or important? Anmccaff (talk) 06:40, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 06:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep There are sources for this place that makes it meet GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Busguy9 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- if not then move to Fairfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Busguy9 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- lots of mentions in books[1]Busguy9 (talk) 22:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Not the most exciting topic, but if there are sources --which seems to be the case--it is okay. --doncram 02:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- comment added a bunch of sources108.75.79.57 (talk) 23:40, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.