Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fair Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Bank

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a lot of articles on this company, but none of them seem to meet the guidelines of WP:NCORP. Here is my analysis of the ones I could find:

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.americanbanker.com/news/immigrant-focused-fintechs-offer-lessons-for-banks			One medium-sized paragraph fails WP:CORPDEPTH	✘ No
https://thefintechtimes.com/is-silicon-valley-losing-its-lustre-big-tech-and-fintechs-move-out/	? mostly quoted from the founder		A longer paragraph, but still not enough for WP:CORPDEPTH	✘ No
https://www.fastcompany.com/90679620/neobanks-fair-khalid-parekh	Written by the company	?		✘ No
https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-ceos-really-think-well-come-back-to-work-11615813207			Company not mentioned	✘ No
https://www.bizjournals.com/houston/inno/stories/inno-insights/2021/12/04/fair-neobank-fintech-refugees-afghanistan-accounts.html	Centers on an interview with the company CEO	?		✘ No
https://finledger.com/articles/fair-a-neobank-and-financial-services-platform-raises-20-million/	Lots of quoting from the company CEO	?		✘ No
https://techcrunch.com/2021/05/10/fair/	Interview, fluffy promo piece	?		✘ No
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fair-launches-first-ever-halal-certified-neobank-and-wealth-building-platform-in-us-301323219.html	?	Questionable source		✘ No
https://www.yahoo.com/now/fair-neobank-announces-refugee-fundraising-140000861.html				✘ No
https://www.paymentsjournal.com/neo-banks-help-those-forgotten-by-traditional-financial-institutions/	?		? Possibly satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH, up to interpretation, a bit promo in tone	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

The company has quite the promotional machine, so independence may be hard to establish. Ovinus (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ovinus (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as promotional and primary-sourced. It's way too soon to tell if this will be a notable company. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, somewhat promotional article tone, lacks wp:SIGCOV. Nythar^T^.^C 01:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it does not seem to have achieved anything yet, hence the lack of notable information. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 18:16, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.