Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faerie Solitaire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. –MuZemike 16:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Faerie Solitaire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Computer based Solitaire game published by Subsoap. Coverage for this is pretty much nil on a basic Google search. Variation on solitaire that doesn't seem to have gained much traction insofar as notability is concerned. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 04:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Fixed it I think... - Pmedema (talk) 18:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep reviewon Gamezebo, review from Meryl Evans, review on Jay is Games, piece on indiegames.com (Gamasutra). There's plenty of sourcing. Someone another 21:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. The reviews at Gamezebo and Jay is Games and others mentioned above are, IMO, enough to establish clear notability - and it is helped along by the win at RealArcade's Great Game Awards, which are a big deal in the casual games industry. -Addionne (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nom comment - I'll concede to this. Shall we snow close this? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 19:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I'll try to get some of these cites into the article at some point. Someone another 06:57, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.