Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fade Away
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete.This is a song by band 12 Stones; the page contains no new information about the song, so there's nothing to merge with the 12 Stones article. Therefore I'm putting it up for deletion. The separate pages for their two albums (12 Stones (album) and Potter's Field (album)) might also be merged and considered for deletion. — simpatico hi 18:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if there were more than a half-sentence already covered on band page, I'd say merge, but as nom states, nothing to merge. Merge other articles as well. KillerChihuahua?!? 21:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this article. However, I see absolutely no reason to delete the album articles and unless someone can convince me otherwise would strongly oppose such a move. --kingboyk 20:45, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If their content was merged into the main 12 Stones article there would be no need for them. —simpatico hi 05:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Convention here seems to be that if a band is notable enough for an article they're notable enough for their albums to have articles too. I accept that the 2 articles in question are not of a high standard at this time, but they may improve. Please, by all means list them for deletion if you think that's the right thing to do (or go ahead and merge them) - I may be a lone voice, who knows. I just think we have enough to do deleting the vanity, spam and cruft and I personally am not interested in deleting articles for the sake of it. --kingboyk 13:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If their content was merged into the main 12 Stones article there would be no need for them. —simpatico hi 05:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.