Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Factory Berlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Factory Berlin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally PROD'd by 2001:16b8:4922:c000:7c1a:b5bb:dc5b:5529 with the reason "marketing article for a commercial entity with little historical information about the site or relevant information about the company. at the least should be separated into a page about the company "factoty real estate" (or whatever it is called) and the historical building" FASTILY 22:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't think the anon. user has a valid rationale for deleting this, and the article looks as if it will pass the notability guides. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:03, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree but the anon IP didn't bring it to Afd. Also Lugnuts, you haven't provided a valid rationale for !voting to keep. Have you checked the references? Can you find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability? HighKing⁺⁺ 17:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are 65 references. Wow. You'd expect to find at least one that meets the criteria for establishing notability. I have checked over half and given up. Not a single reference comes close. They are all either based on company announcements (fails WP:ORGIND) or from unreliable sources such as facebook and youtube, or mentions-in-passing where the building (and not the company) is the focus of the reference. If someone can point out any references that meet the criteria as per WP:NCORP I'm happy to revisit and possible change my mind but for now, this fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The 'hub' is not notable. It appears to have just a couple of dozen companies, most of these startup companies will have just a few part time employees. I checked some of the refs randomly and they were PR bluster. The 'factory' was created just 5 years ago. This is paid or coi. Szzuk (talk) 06:39, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was thinking of listing it or deletion myself. All references are mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.