Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabrizio Rizzolo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:13, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fabrizio Rizzolo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. Nothing sourced to RS, and even looking at IMDB doesn't really tell me how well-known he might be. No GHits that aren't personal sites, Amazon, or other wikis. He hasn't even got an article in Italian WP. MSJapan (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 05:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I have found nothing better at all and his list of works says it all, nothing minimally convincing of any better. SwisterTwister talk 17:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Just added more information regarding discography. --Fadesga (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Fadesga:: If the subject is to qualify under WP:NMUSIC, the song has to have charted, because the label doesn't appear to be notable (it only lasted a few years). The FIMI charts for Italy don't seem to go back far enough to get chart position for this particular artist, and discogs isn't RS for N, only V. MSJapan (talk) 04:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.