Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fable 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal-ball. Aksi_great (talk) 11:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fable 3[edit]
No possible way to get verifiable sources, Fable 2 isn't out yet. Amarkov blahedits 03:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Should be speedied This definitely meets the criteria of db-empty. Diez2 03:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete speculation. ReverendG 04:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete That is one of the funniest entries ever. Missvain 04:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. MER-C 05:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The talk page is an explicit admission of WP:AUTO/WP:COI and WP:NOT a web host. Anyway this is crystall balling, unverified/original research, WP:NOT a game guide and borderline advertising spam. Kudos to young Mr/Ms. Amarkov for keeping a cool head in the face of some utterly pathetic behaviour [1][2]. -- IslaySolomon | talk 07:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The talk page pretty much admits that this is pure nonsense. Zetawoof(ζ) 08:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete passes the fails everything test. SkierRMH,11:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete though the talk page is rather funny. Hut 8.5 12:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, wikipedia is NOT a crystal ball. --Wizardman 17:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Don't miss the Talk page per Hut 8.5. --Dhartung | Talk 21:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 03:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - Just read the talk page. DarkSaber2k 15:29, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.