Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faaspeak
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Faaspeak[edit]
- Faaspeak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
More neologism shenanigans. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No references are provided to demonstrate the truth of the article and the only things I find online about "Faaspeak" refer to the Federal Aviation Administration. I'm not sure if this is just someone trying to take credit for what's I've always thought of as "leetspeak" but I guess it doesn't matter since there's no measure of notability here. Mostly likely hoax/OR/WP:NFT, etc. Rnb (talk) 03:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is just a neologism for SMS language. I can find no evidence of use of the expression "Faaspeak" to refer to anything other than the aviation jargon mentioned by Rnb. Considering that this article's Faaspeak is supposed to be an Internet activity, zero relevant Google hits outside Wikipedia does not speak well for its notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
DONT DELETE!! you guys shouldnt delete it. its full of information. is epic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.72.102.246 (talk) 04:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable new language, made up at school one day. JIP | Talk 05:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete... put quite simply, Wikypdya is nt fr thngs md up 1 dy. OBM | blah blah blah 16:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 18:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources to back up the claim that this is notable. I'm an Editorofthewiki[citation needed] 19:45, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.