Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fa11out
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 21:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fa11out (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
GNG fail. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- I think we should keep article because they have some press coverage. There might be some major edits for sure. Obviously they exist and they are active in many thing mentioned in article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.234.110 (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:27, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 13:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲水 13:07, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: none of the sources provided are independent, reliable and provide significant coverage. Therefore it's a likely music notability and general notability failure. SITH (talk) 14:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep With multiple reliable secondary sources passes WP:GNG.-Splinemath (talk) 23:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep sufficient reliable sources appear to exist to warrant an article per WP:NMUSIC. ——SN54129 18:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.