Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUNLIB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Deleted per G7 - User Request. Article deleted by Tanthalas39 at 03:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC). UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:19, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FUNLIB[edit]
- FUNLIB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article was originally proposed for deletion as it did not cite any sources per WP:N and WP:V, and that searching didn't reveal any sources. Since then, the article has been blanked then stubified by the author but no sources have bee added. It's been about a month since the prod, so I'm bringing it here. Gazimoff WriteRead 07:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn - Article has since been speedily deleted under criterion G7. Gazimoff WriteRead 00:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for want of sources that aren't Wikipedia mirrors. WillOakland (talk) 00:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is deleted already... Mm40 (talk | contribs) 15:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.