Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FRAME:S

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FRAME:S

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There really aren't sufficient reliable, third-party sources to establish notability or to demonstrate that the subject has received significant third-party coverage. Current sources are not objective, third-party references and rely heavily on writings of Staffan Garpebring, who created the subject of the article. dci | TALK 18:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This psychological concept appears not to have made any impact on the field. It does not appear to have received any notice outside of the writings of its creator, Steffan Garpebring. He himself has minimal citations at Google Scholar, and I could not find any references at all to FRAME:S or FRAMES that were not by Garpebring. --MelanieN (talk) 03:14, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.