Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FOCJ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FOCJ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be notable at all, it's just a concept devised by some two people. No sources apart from the general one. External link is dead, don't think this publication exists anymore. BeŻet (talk) 15:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Nothing here indicates that the concept is notable within the fields of political science, philosophy, economics, or anywhere outside its own creators' writings. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.