Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FLY91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:10, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FLY91 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Here we are again. Last AfD resulted in DRAFTIFY as an WP:ATD. Moved from draft space by only keep vote from last AfD. References added (other than Twitter) are announcements around it leasing aircraft on its way to launch. Still WP:TOOSOON and the churnalism doesn't add up to significant coverage. CNMall41 (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The airline already has it's first plane VT-NUT running test proving flights in India. I do not think it is too soon or worthy of deletion. Aircraft was delivered 2 days ago and is leased from Mumbai based VMAN leasing.
Article definitely needs to be updated with the latest info. The first aircraft is an ex-TruJet ATR 72-600. Mkkm2112 (talk) 16:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Its first plane* (sorry - autocorrect) Mkkm2112 (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the previous draftify, and the fact creator just attempted to draftify again after this discussion began, I think that would be the opposite of what needs to happen. I would actually recommend SALTing. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.