Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Sloboda Čačak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. As it is not a BLP, there is no pressing need to move to draft for improvement or otherwise remove it from mainspace to allow time for improvement and research for sources unless Joy wishes to work in draft space rather than worry about the timing of another AfD. Star Mississippi 17:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FK Sloboda Čačak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Serbian football club fails WP:GNG. This article was deleted under WP:A7 almost 10 years ago, and it has only recently been undeleted. GTrang (talk) 03:29, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 04:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. The Giant Snowman is correct, are there sources that provide SIGCOV and help establish GNG? That is what is demanded now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify: The arguments to keep this article all have merit, but in it's present state, it fails WP:GNG. I recommend draftifying it to give the person who requested undeletion (or anyone else for that matter) the chance to add sources improve it so that it meets Wikipedia's standards.DesiMoore (talk) 16:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – No sources presented for WP:V, and there is not even a related article in Serbian for comparison. The keep votes did not bring in any new sources. Svartner (talk) 01:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Draft Valid nomination, but some of the processes here, why the article was revived and not improve seems to be a red flag. Because the article hasn't been improved and it's been nine days since my last comment and I can't see any validity why this should be kept. I have no qualms for it going to draft space, but that feels like it would die there. The keep arguments above haven't provided any source material for this to be kept either. Govvy (talk) 20:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It is very difficult to search for sources because of the shared name with Sloboda Čačak, the factory. Do you have any tips for terms that would aid the search? Geschichte (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.