Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIREWALKER

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to NSA ANT catalog. In accordance with the below discussion, I have also deleted FIREWALKER as it has been deemed to be a mistaken title for FIREWALK. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FIREWALKER

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a seemingly non-existent technology. No mention of the subject in any reliable sources. Possibly a hoax. - Mr X 18:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This doesn't seem to actually exist as far as I can tell. The only source is a rather dodgy blog and I can't really find coverage to show that this specific term was actually a used term. Even if it was, a specific codeword wouldn't be noteworthy enough to pass GNG. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:18, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The product isn't "FIREWALKER", it's "FIREWALK". I do see coverage for it, but I need further inspection, since it appears "firewalk" was already a name for some network hacking tool mentioned alongside of traceroute in an article by Cisco. —Largo Plazo (talk) 21:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have renamed the article accordingly.- Mr X 17:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete no rs. not a notable subject. per tokiogirl Dloh cierekim 00:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect to NSA ANT catalog - It seems the catalog itself is notable, but I doubt the individual "products" are, at least now.- Mr X 14:03, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect after title change per MrX. I've now done my research and find no direct, non-trivial focus on this product, but the redirect would be useful. However, FIREWALKER isn't the name of the product. It's FIREWALK. Therefore, whatever the outcome of this discussion, not having a FIREWALKER article should be part of it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.