Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA Club of the Century

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Real Madrid C.F.. v/r - T P 17:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA Club of the Century[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this fails WP:GNG. Though Real Madrid having won this poll is noted in a few places there seems to be little third-party coverage of the award itself in any depth. Note that Template:FIFA Clubs of the 20th Century has just been deleted. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the information should be tightened and merged into Real Madrid as there isn't enough coverage to justify a separate page. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 08:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete as above; no evidence this award is independently notable. Giant Snowman 10:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. As above. No substatial coverage that merits a stand-alone article. Argyle 4 Life^talk 12:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Maybe each of the top five clubs could get a mention in their article? But this shouldn't be an article. Adam4267 (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete IMHO, it should not be removed but detailed in the case of an FIFA award. That article is similar to this one. If the problem is the uniqueness of the subject of the article would have to merge both in an article called "FIFA Century Awards" or something...--Dantetheperuvian (talk) 01:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Dantetheperuvian. Perfect reasoning. —Lesfer ^(t/c/@) 01:11, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.