Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA 09 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rudget (Help?) 12:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA 09

The only source is a press release, itself not cited satisfactorily. Prod/prod2 removed by anon user without comment. Propose deletion on grounds of WP:V, WP:N and WP:CRYSTAL. Marasmusine (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 06:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's been deleted twice, although, the game will be released within the next couple of months so a page should exist but then WP:NOTCRYSTAL. But seeing as there's no sources, I'll vote delete. ——Ryan | t • c 16:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not a crystal ball. JIP | Talk 17:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In addition to the reasons listed above, the article is unsourced, and reads more like a press release. I don't know who David Rutter is, and, I'm sure, neither do most other readers. 69.109.220.46 (talk) 00:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.Hadrianos1990 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I get the feeling that more information on this is coming soon, but so far there is no reliable information on it. Not even the faintest attempt to assert notability. Better to create the article when there's actual verifiable information. Fails WP:CRYSTAL, WP:N and WP:V. Randomran (talk) 01:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's a bit early to be creating an article for this game because at present, it's just a stub and violates policies such as WP:CRYSTAL. --EclipseSSD (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not announced yet. --SkyWalker (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and relist AFD tag ahs not been on article for three days after an anon removed it. I don't see how this could therefore be interpretted as a fair discussion. 16:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pretty Green (talk • contribs)
- We can simply leave the AfD open longer. --EEMIV (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bduke (talk) 09:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an unreferenced violation of WP:CRYSTAL. There doesn't seem to be much, if any, information available from reliable sources right now. ~ mazca ^talk 10:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Randomran – no potential for expansion at this time, given lack of sources. haz (talk) 11:29, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.