Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Mojo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 21:49, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FC Mojo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renomination of already deleted article. The club is not a part of either 2nd Division East or 2nd Division West, and they are not registered by Zealand Football Association (SBU). It is a vanity article (according to memory the first version of the article talked about a 7-a-side lowest-league team) with a joke facebook group. With FC Mojo, I also nominate related articles Nicolai Helbo, Anita Maskova, and Munkekær Stadium (which is not identical to the "Solrød Idrætscenter" stadium of da:Solrød Fodbold Club). The group of articles is created by Jellies (talk · contribs), who has edited many articles to include FC Mojo, and the probably related 77.233.255.211 (talk · contribs). Poulsen (talk) 10:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The FC MOJO team is, as far as I am aware of, registret under the name Solrød FC (1) link. And the Munkekjær stadium might not be identical to the "Solrød Idrætscenter" stadium, but is a part of "Solrød Idrætcenter"'s football fields. Furthermore I find Poulsen (talk) judgement highly subjective, as to his intrepetation of the facebook page as a joke. Trillo255 (talk) 15:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This user's four edits to this AfD are their only contributions to Wikipedia. The accounts appears to have been created specifically to comment here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So, just because this is the first time i take an active part in the wikipedia community, my opinions are less important than yours? Or what is it exactly that you are implying? I had some information on this particular page, that I felt was worth sharing, and that should be cast aside just because this is the only information i've had so far, that has been worth sharing? Please explain. Trillo255 (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If players of one of Solrød FC's three amateur 7-a-side teams chose to call themselves FC Mojo, then good on you, but it doesn't warrant a Wikipedia article. And if the Facebook group isn't a joke, I look forward to Mojo signing "Man Utd forward" Casper Holmer.. ;-) Poulsen (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will not comment on the first part of your comment, as I simply do not have the particuler knowlegde to answer that. However, I didn't dissagree, as to the fact, that some parts of the facebook page uses humor. I disagree that it is "a joke facebook group". Trillo255 (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G4 - This article is the same as the one deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Mojo.Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not identical - the original article stated FC Mojo is a semi-professional football club based in Solrød, Denmark which plays in the DBU 7-mands Pulje 5 and is one of the least succesful clubs in the history of Danish football, winning nothing at all.'' Bettia (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Whether or not they are related to Solrod FC or not is pretty irrelevant as they only appear to be a local 7-a-side team - teams such as this are rarely (if ever) notable. A quick Google search gives us the Facebook page, a Firefox theme, and what appears to be a Sunday league team from Finland. There's nothing to suggest this "FC Mojo" are in any way notable. Bettia (talk) 14:38, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Football Club Mojo Bettia, can you please define local? Every football team is local to the neighbor of it, but other than that I don't see how FC Mojo is in any way more local than Manchester United or fuck knows who you would regard as worthy of your extravagant permission to publishing. Other than that, I have my doubts in whether you, who doesn't even come from Denmark, but probably only heard of it as the capital of Ikea, would know the first thing about what Danish clubs are worthy of mentioning on a 'free' encyclopedia. The very fact that you link to a Finnish rock cafe says it all. You probably couldn't understand "Antichrist" either, but that doesn't mean that it should be deleted from Wikipedia, OR DOES IT? Now, I believe that each and everyone of you stand for the very foundation of what's wrong with the world today. Every time there's something you don't understand, your first go-to-point is Facebook and Google, but guess the fuck what, everything is not on Google. I dare you to find a link where you will understand the meaning of Samarpan and the meaning of life through Buddhism, although a whole lot of homepages claim to do just that. I dare you to find a picture of my toe that was badly injured two weeks ago. Well, that meant a great deal to me and my team and our fans, and you may not care, but I don't care about Ipswich Town FC's wiki-page, and a looot of other pages - Danser med Drenge, Renault and Budweiser to name three. So I guess my point is, that even though you may know who the man on the American 100-dollar bill is, you don't have a clue about when our new orange football-jerseys will come, but does it matter more to you who's on the American 100-dollar bill than it matters to us when it will come? I guess the fuck it doesn't. So excuse me for caring about other things than your beloved Michael Jackson-page or shitload of space-reservating [[user:]]-pages, but perhaps you shouldn't delete every single page that you happen to be unable to google or facebook or what the hell you want to do to disguise what this is all about; your ignorance and your absolute inability to know anything about any matter without asking a god damn pixel-generating, inter-communicating, global warming-accelerating piece of shit you call a PC. Jellies Jellies 20:47, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks are both inappropriate and unnecessary. It is easy to prevent the deletion of this article- simply cite two or three newspaper articles that have been written about it, verifying that the team plays at the highest level of its sport. Most notable sports teams will have dozens, usually hundreds, of articles written about their significance. If this is a notable team, finding sources should be absurdly easy. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:47, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If this team does not play in the highest level of the sport, and has not been written about in a significant way by independent, reliable sources like newspapers and magazines, then it does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. I did a Google news search and didn't find anyone writing about this team in a significant way. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - still non-notable. Giant Snowman 21:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is not a notable club. Besides, I have reservations that the team actually plays in the Danish 2nd Division West currently. -S iva1979^{Talk to me} 09:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.