Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FBI Files on Frank Sinatra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. Kudos to Faradayplank, who did the merge.chaser - t 17:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FBI Files on Frank Sinatra

Not notable for its own article. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's fine. Limetolime ^{Talk to me} ^• ^{look what I did!} 14:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Surely a redirect? What do you mean it's fine? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or delete - seems made to advertise a book; not sufficient notability on its own. Huon (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge to Frank Sinatra. This is about two subjects with obvious notability. This isn't an article about some fan club and how they looked after the object of their affection but a major government agency. That said, the article lacks references and is written like a teaser to go out and buy the book.--Faradayplank (talk) 16:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Strong Keep Merge/Redirect~~ Take a look at this search, on the first page you have the FBI archives, NPR, MSNBC & Washington Post. Maybe later I'll add the references and clean it up when I have some more time --Faradayplank (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Frank Sinatra#Controversy. I added refs and merged the article into the main, cut out some duplicate info. It works well there. --Faradayplank (talk) 18:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect – This would fit nicely in the controversy section of the Frank Sinatra piece. If it becomes to long over time, we can always break-it-out then. ShoesssS ^Talk 17:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect This belongs in the Sinatra article, not as a standalone piece. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.