Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Félag íslenskra þjóðernissinna
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:56, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Félag íslenskra þjóðernissinna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article about this - apparently controversial - organization has been unsourced since more than a year. Apart from WP:V issues, this raises concerns regarding notability, all the more because the article says that the group is small, inactive, and never had much influence. The talk page also suggests that sources are difficult to find, if they exist at all. B. Wolterding (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--this has been tagged long enough, and as it stands, it cannot stand, without sources or even much of a claim to notability (a claim which the article really denies. Good job, B. Wolterding. Drmies (talk) 02:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability not established. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per OP. Funny thing to have an article that establishes the non-notability of the subject--Pgallert (talk) 14:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.