Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraterrestrial Biological Entity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT, I suppose Extraterrestrial life is the better target. -Splash^talk 00:33, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extraterrestrial Biological Entity[edit]

A quick dicdef, then a paranoid rant. Unless someone knows of a good place to redirect to, Delete. --InShaneee 21:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:V. A bunch of allegedly captured UFO's. I'm amazed the article didn't mention Area 51. Fan1967 22:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 (UTC)

Delete as above --Splette Talk 23:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words The word 'allegedly' in no way serves to give any notability to the claims made in this article. Blank the text and redirect to Greys. (aeropagitica) 23:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ~~UFO~~ Extraterrestrial life. The Greys are just one species of EBE. Ewlyahoocom 10:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism, or redirect per Ewlyahoocom. (Removing the original research is a given.) Peter Grey 13:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm not sure what qualifies as a neologism but EBE has been around for at least as long as the X-files[1] (> 10 years) which I think had a big hand in popularizing the term (along with the "you-foe" pronounciation of "UFO"). Ewlyahoocom 14:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although it needs ot be expanded on, undoubtedly.
- Unsigned comment by User:82.37.138.147 --InShaneee 02:10, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is a worthwhile article and could be made far better but as stated it does need to be expanded on.
- Unsigned comment by User:195.92.40.49. --InShaneee 22:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It explains the term, which does not qualify yet to the sister project of the dictionary
- Unsigned comment by User:200.180.162.208. User's only edit. --InShaneee 22:25, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep no reason to delete. good info inside. Unixer 12:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.