Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ExpoMarketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ExpoMarketing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of press releases, primary sources, and brief mentions, but not significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:GNG/WP:ORG (and that it was created by a blocked paid editor doesn't help, but is not itself reason for deletion). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unable to find any good new sources. Best cited source is [1] and is local so does not necessarily satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. ~Kvng (talk) 19:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing at all noticeably convincing for the needed notability, clearly nothing for minimal notability at best. SwisterTwister talk 22:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.