Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experiencology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as blatant spam RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Experiencology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO, seems to be a term coined by Stephanie Weaver for her self-help seminars. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's so blatant that it can be speedy deleted per WP:G11. I've tagged it so. We'll see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.