Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exobasidiomycetes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator (non-admin close). PeterSymonds | talk 19:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exobasidiomycetes[edit]

This article only refers to another article and does not provide any information or context. Billscottbob (talk) 22:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think the article is better now. In any event, a biological class or order is automatically notable. --Eastmain (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The taxon exists and the article appears to be a valid stub now. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 06:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Biological classifications are obviously encyclopedic. The article has been expanded into a functional stub with references. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:33, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw Nomination. The article is much better now. Billscottbob (talk) 18:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.