Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Excellence (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellence

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was overwhelming consensus to delete this page in 2005, but it appears that the XFD was erroneously closed as no consensus due to a ~~single~~ two "keep vote." Clear-cut case of WP:NOTDICT that should be deleted. - car chasm (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a dictionary definition, not an encyclopedia article. Clear delete. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 11:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DICDEF. BilletsMauves^€500 17:36, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Delete This isn't Wiktionary. --Panther999 (talk) 18:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.